-
Re: Foundries Allowing Modification
I mean modifying a commercial font you've licensed, ending up with a new font (that you cannot redistribute however). Most foundries used to allow it, now most don't. I think they followed Monotype's…2 -
Re: EULAs: No Modifications Clauses.
I've hranted on about this a few times before. Short version: the no-mod clause is unethical. More: http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/23090/#Comment_23090 & http://typedrawers.com/discuss…1 -
Re: What was the very first typeface described as “feminine”?
I don't find what people don't know they're missing to be a good way forward. But as long as you think there's some place for gender associations in type (like the reviewer scenario) then I'm happy.1 -
Re: Plex; IBM's new font identity model
@"Shahab Siavash" Helvetica is a succubus (or incubus, if one prefers).1 -
Re: Plex; IBM's new font identity model
It looks like Bold Monday did the actual work: http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/31485/#Comment_31485 But yes, it's great to also see a type designer in such a high position on the inside.3
